Mandatory Adoption Of IFRS And Earnings Transparency In Korea

Does Mandatory IFRS Adoption

We test whether mandatory IFRS adoption affects firm-level ‘crash risk,’ defined as the frequency of extreme negative stock returns. We separately analyze non-financial firms and financial firms because IFRS is likely to affect their crash risk differently. We find that crash risk decreases among non-financial firms after IFRS adoption, especially among firms in poor information environments an...

Mandatory IFRS Adoption and Financial Statement Comparability

This study examines whether mandatory adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) leads to capital market benefits through enhanced financial statement comparability. UK domestic standards are considered very similar to IFRS (Bae et al. 2008), suggesting any capital market benefits observed for UK-domiciled firms are more likely attributable to improvements in comparability (...

Mandatory IFRS Adoption and Accounting Conservatism

Using a large sample of listed firms from 17 European countries that mandatorily adopted IFRS over the period 2005-2008, we examine the effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on accounting conservatism defined using Basu’s (1997) differential timeliness (DT) measure. An important distinction of our study is that we avoid the common criticisms of the DT measure by comparing the difference in the DT m...

Testing the Transparency Implications of Mandatory IFRS Adoption: The Spread/Maturity Relation of Credit Default Swaps

Impact of Mandatory IFRS Adoption on Conditional Conservatism in Europe

We study the effect of the mandatory adoption of IFRS in Europe in 2005 on conditional conservatism. To capture conditional conservatism, we use three measures: the Basu (1997) measure, the Khan and Watts (2009) measure, and a measure controlling for potential shifts in unconditional conservatism and cost of capital after the adoption of IFRS. From a sample of 7,251 firm-year observations drawn...